Peer review – issues, limitations, and future development
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Peer Review – Legal and Ethical Issues Faced by Medical Staff: The Mandate for Physician Leadership
Physicians working in hospitals face challenges when it comes to understanding and meeting the medical, legal, and ethical subjects outlined in the hospital bylaws. Hospital staff physicians and the hospital administration both aspire for high quality medical care and the assurance of patient safety. Unfortunately, when quality concerns surface, there can be reasonable differences of opinion as...
متن کاملPeer review: past, present, and future.
Most of the authors look at peer review as something which is a ‘black box’ and ‘a hurdle to be crossed’. That is ironical as peer review exists to ensure that good science prospers and is shared. A better appreciation of the respective roles of the authors, reviewers and editors is desirable for a good publication to emerge. Over the years, peer review has taken many shapes and continues to ev...
متن کاملPeer Review: Recent Experience and Future Directions
This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution , reselling , loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date...
متن کاملNumerical development: current issues and future perspectives
The goal of this article is to give an overview about current issues and future perspectives in numerical development. First, we shortly discuss the evidence for an innate number sense. As one core representation of a supposed innate number sense is pre(non)verbal quantity representation, we discuss contrasting models of such a pre(non)verbal quantity representation. We then introduce calculati...
متن کامل24 : The future of peer review RICHARD
Currently peer review is thought to be slow, expensive, profligate of academic time, highly subjective, prone to bias, easily abused, poor at detecting gross defects, and almost useless for detecting fraud. One cannot predict the future but at present there do not seem to be serious alternatives to peer review. Peer review has been structurally static since the nineteenth century mainly through...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: ScienceOpen Research
سال: 2015
ISSN: 2199-1006
DOI: 10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-edu.ayxips.v1